Template talk:Did you know

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Did you know...?"
Discussion
"3D fanart Noel From Sora no Method" by XkungWork

WT:DYK
Rules WP:DYK
Supplementary rules WP:DYKSG
Noms (awaiting approval) WP:DYKN
Reviewing guide WP:DYKR
Noms (approved) WP:DYKNA
Preps & Queues T:DYK/Q
Currently on Main Page
Main Page errors WP:ERRORS
Archive of DYKs WP:DYKA
Stats WP:DYKSTATS

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Nominations that have been approved are moved to a staging area, from which the articles are promoted into the Queue.

Contents

Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
March 9 1
April 1 1
April 3 1
April 4 1
April 5 2 1
April 7 1
April 8 1
April 9 1
April 12 1
April 14 1
April 15 1
April 18 1
April 20 2
April 21 1
April 22 2
April 23 2
April 24 1
April 25 3 1
April 26 1
April 27 6 1
April 28 1 1
April 29 1
April 30 1
May 1 4 3
May 2 1
May 3 4
May 4 4 1
May 5 1
May 6 1
May 7 2
May 8 1
May 9 3 1
May 10 2
May 11 1 1
May 12 2
May 13 3 2
May 14 2 2
May 15 6 3
May 16 7 7
May 17 5 2
May 18 7 4
May 19 6 2
May 20 9 4
May 21 9 4
May 22 7 4
May 23 7 4
May 24 7 3
May 25 7 2
May 26 4 2
May 27 11 3
May 28 7 4
May 29 6 4
May 30 8 5
May 31 8
June 1 14 3
June 2 3 1
June 3 1
Total 204 75
Last updated 11:19, 3 June 2017 UTC
Current time is 12:30, 3 June 2017 UTC [refresh]

Instructions for nominators[edit]

Create a subpage for your new DYK suggestion and then list the page below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the bottom. Any registered user may nominate a DYK suggestion (if you are not a registered user, please leave a message at the bottom of the DYK project talk page with the details of the article you would like to nominate and the hook you would like to propose); self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination (consider watchlisting your nomination page).

If this is your first nomination, please read the DYK rules before continuing:
Official DYK criteria: DYK rules and supplementary guidelines
Unofficial guide: Learning DYK

To nominate an article[edit]

Read these instructions completely before proceeding.

For simplified instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK 2.

I.
Create the nomination subpage.

Enter the article title in the box below and click the button. (To nominate multiple articles together, enter any or all of the article titles.) You will then be taken to a preloaded nomination page.


II.
Write the nomination.

On the nomination page, fill in the relevant information. See Template:NewDYKnomination and {{NewDYKnomination/guide}} for further information.

  • Not every line of the template needs to be filled in. For instance, if you are not nominating an image to appear with your hook, there is no need to fill in the image-related lines.
  • Add an edit summary e.g. "Nominating YOUR ARTICLE TITLE for DYK" and click Save page.
  • Make sure the nomination page is on your watchlist, so you can follow the review discussion.
III.

In the current nominations section find the subsection for the date on which the article was created or on which expansion began, not the date on which you make the nomination.

  • At the top of that subsection (before other nominations already there, but below the section head and hidden comment) add {{Did you know nominations/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE}}.
  • Add an edit summary e.g. "Nominating YOUR ARTICLE TITLE for DYK" and click Save page.
  • Consider adding {{Did you know nominations/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE}} to the article's talk page (without a section heading‍—‌the template adds a section heading automatically).

How to review a nomination[edit]

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article to which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the supplementary guidelines and the WP:Did you know/Reviewing guide.

To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:

  • Look through this page, Template talk:Did you know, to find a nomination you would like to comment on.
  • Click the "Review or comment" link at the top of the nomination. You will be taken to the nomination subpage.
  • The top of the page includes a list of the DYK criteria. Check the article to ensure it meets all the relevant criteria.
  • To indicate the result of the review (i.e., whether the nomination passes, fails, or needs some minor changes), leave a signed comment on the page. Please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following:

    Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.

    If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a line :* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* --> showing you where you should put the comment.
  • Save the page.

If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

Backlogged?[edit]

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first (so that those hooks don't grow stale), it may take several weeks until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions above).

Where is my hook?[edit]

If you can't find the nomination you submitted to this nominations page, it may have been approved and is on the approved nominations page waiting to be promoted. It could also have been added to one of the prep areas, promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.

If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Search archived DYK nomination discussions[edit]

Instructions for other editors[edit]

How to promote an accepted hook[edit]

  • See Wikipedia:Did you know/Preparation areas for full instructions.
  • Hooks that have been approved are located on the approved nominations page.
  • In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote.
  • In another window, open the prep set you intend to add the hook to.
  • In the prep set...
    • Paste the hook into the hook area (be sure to not paste in that that)
    • Paste the credit information ({{DYKmake}} and/or {{DYKnom}}) into the credits area.
    • Add an edit summary, e.g. "Promoted [[Jane Fonda]]", preview, and save
  • Back on DYK nomination page...
    • change {{DYKsubpage to {{subst:DYKsubpage
    • change |passed= to |passed=yes
    • Add an edit summary, e.g. "Promoted to Prep 3", preview, and save

How to remove a rejected hook[edit]

  • Open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to remove. (It's best to wait several days after a reviewer has rejected the hook, just in case someone contests or the article undergoes a large change.)
  • In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line {{DYKsubpage with {{subst:DYKsubpage, and replace |passed= with |passed=no. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a blue archive box and stating that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.

How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue[edit]

  • Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
  • Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
    • View the edit history for that page
    • Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
    • Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
  • Add a transclusion of the template back to this page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from this page.
  • If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.
  • Add a link to the nomination subpage at Wikipedia:Did you know/Removed to help in tracking removals.

How to move a nomination subpage to a new name[edit]

  • Don't; it should not ever be necessary, and will break some links which will later need to be repaired. Even if you change the title of the article, you don't need to move the nomination page.

Nominations[edit]

Older nominations[edit]

Articles created/expanded on March 9[edit]

Hallelujah Chorus

Speaker iconHallelujah Chorus
    • ALT1:... that people traditionally stand during the performance of the Easter chorus "Hallelujah Chorus" (sound) because King George II reportedly did at the London premiere? Source: University of Chicago
  • Reviewed: Jean-Nicolas Corvisart
  • Comment: for 16 April (Easter Day) and I'd like to request we use the sound.

Converted from a redirect by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 10:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg - Length, Date, Cite, QPQ, and Earwigs check for both hooks. Mifter Public (talk) 20:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg I have pulled this from prep not only because the promoted (ALT1) hook is problematic, but because in addition to the two templates I added earlier, both caused by misunderstanding or misrepresenting the sources in the material, the article gets too many facts wrong. For example, the claim that it took a full week to write the chorus. The source says it took nine days for Handel to write Part II of Messiah, yet the final chorus took seven of those nine days? Not only is that improbable, but the source (christianity.com, which strikes me as somewhat dubious) doesn't even make the one-week claim. The Ross source is talking about Messiah in general, not the Hallelujah Chorus in particular. And so on. I do have doubts about the original hook as well, in part because of the source of that claim. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  • No, I'm afraid the edits to the article have done nothing to address my objections, and if it weren't well past my bedtime I'd replace both templates right now; you're still misrepresenting the Ross source, and the sentence about oratorio and chorus still does not make sense. You also haven't addressed whether christianity.com is a RS. If you make further edits, I'll certainly look at them, but I won't be returning for many hours. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
If we have to have yet another fork of Messiah (Handel) (main article --> Messiah Part II --> H.Chorus), can we at least try to make the newest one line up with the featured article at the top of the tree? To quote that: "The custom of standing for the "Hallelujah" chorus originates from a belief that, at the London premiere, King George II did so, which would have obliged all to stand. There is no convincing evidence that the king was present, or that he attended any subsequent performance of Messiah; the first reference to the practice of standing appears in a letter dated 1756, three years prior to Handel's death.[52][53]" I'm tempted to slap a {{merge}} template on this article, because there's nothing useful in it that couldn't be added to one of the other articles about the Messiah, or (indeed) isn't already said there in better ways. BencherliteTalk 10:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Merge template now added. A lot of the material currently in the article was just copied word-for-word, or paraphrased, from other Messiah-related articles anyway. BencherliteTalk 11:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, The C of E, but there is no chance that this will be able to run for Easter. Even aside from the merge discussion, Duplication Detector shows 1170 prose characters copied from Messiah Part II, which would require a minimum of 5850 prose characters for this article, well more than the 4305 it currently contains. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
This is not an expansion nomination, this is a creation from redirect nomination therefore the 5x rule does not apply here. All that applies here is that the part from Messiah is discounted in the character count, which will still take it over the 1,500 threshold. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
The C of E, read WP:DYKSG#A5, which is quite clear: you have copied material from a pre-existing Wikipedia article into this one, and it therefore must be 5x expanded. You should also read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, because you failed to acknowledge the copying when creating the article, which is a violation of Wikipedia's rules about attribution, something you need to fix. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
@Bluemoonset: Very well, I have now brought it up and over that character count so it can now be promoted back now. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
The C of E, this nomination isn't going anywhere until the merge discussion has concluded (which will require a closure by someone uninvolved in the discussion). As I said earlier, I don't see any possibility of this happening prior to Easter: seven days from the opening, the absolute minimum for a discussion like this, is April 17, the day after Easter. I BlueMoonset (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 1[edit]

Lazy Afternoon (Barbra Streisand album)

Expanded by Carbrera (talk). Self-nominated at 1:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Just a question – how can the liner notes verify that this was her first album with handwritten notes? I understand that you may be able to use them as a primary source for the fact that the notes are handwritten, but unless the notes say that this is her first album to do so, it probably qualifies as WP:OR. 97198 (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
  • @97198: She states in the notes, "While I usually let the vinyl speak for itself, I really had fun making this record, and I thought it might interest you to know something about each song. After all, I wouldn't want to be a chef who doesn't share her secrets!" Maybe this helps. Carbrera (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC).
  • I don't think that verifies the hook as written, but if you disagree you can add a "new review" symbol below so you can get a second opinion. 97198 (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Second opinion here. I'm afraid this is rather clearly OR - the source only says that she "usually let the vinyl speak for itself", which implies that she sometimes did not (i.e. in previous albums). It doesn't say that this is the first time she had written notes, so I don't see how it can be used to make a statement to that effect. A new hook is needed (and I'd recommend changing that statement in the article given the OR problem). Prioryman (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Striking hook per original and second opinion. Carbrera, please provide a new hook. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
  • ALT1 ... that, after listening to Rupert Holmes's album Widescreen, Barbra Streisand contacted him to collaborate on Lazy Afternoon? Source: The Quietus
  • On it. — LlywelynII 21:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

    Symbol possible vote.svg Timely; article long enough (~10.5k elig. chars.) and hook terse enough; grammar mistakes in hook fixed; article sourced but completely omits hook in its entirety let alone a source for it. Once that's fixed, Earwig finds copyvio but it's only from pulled quotes and is actually fine. — LlywelynII 21:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  • LlywelynII – Do you think you could help me in developing a better hook? I seem to be having some trouble with this. Carbrera (talk) 03:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC).
  • Eh, just pick something in the article that's actually there and sourced. I can't give you one, since then I couldn't do any review of it. — LlywelynII 16:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


Articles created/expanded on April 5[edit]

MBT-80

  • Comment: This will be my fourth DYK credit, if approved.

5x expanded by Ceannlann gorm (talk). Self-nominated at 20:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Much of the article is sourced to two unreliable sources. This source is a forum post and this source is a blog. SL93 (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi SL93. TankNutDave is closely associated with the Bovington Tank Museum, so can be considered to be a RS. In a similar vein, the Secret Projects Forum among other things is well known for as acting as a sort of clearing house and information exchange for Military historians, Aerospace researchers, etc. from various countries. As such, it has been used as an RS for a fair few articles in different subject matters across Wikipedia over the years, being considered generally more reliable than your average internet forum. This is especially the case where the linked SPF post or topic in turn links to, or otherwise directly references, other reliable sources such as academic/reference works or contemporary official documentation for the information shown. If you are still worried, I could try and break out some of the RSs mentioned in the relevant linked topic and add them directly to the article as additional references? Ceannlann gorm (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm still not too sure of the blog being considered reliable. The other one is still an internet forum and what stops someone from registering and misinterpreting the sourced content or even just flat out lying? Some more content needs cites too - The end of the Armament section, the end of the Protection section, most of the Sensors section, and the entire Versions and Variants section. I will start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know about the two sources. SL93 (talk) 22:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok. I'll have to head away now, so any more inline citations will have to wait until tomorrow at the earliest, assuming other things don't get in the way (it's been one of those weeks). Ceannlann gorm (talk) 23:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Came here after seeing SL93's post at WTDYK. I'm afraid I have to agree with their conclusions; these sources do not appear to be reliable. This does not mean that the information provided by them is false, necessarily; but it does mean that we cannot rely upon them. One of the crucial criteria for reliability is editorial oversight, and accountability. A news organization has editors, who are in turn accountable to the owner. A blog is accountable to nobody. An internet forum even less so. As far as I could tell, I could get onto this forum tomorrow, and say plausible-sounding but incorrect stuff, and unless somebody noticed, there would be no consequences. Vanamonde (talk) 05:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • @Ceannlann gorm: It's been quite a while since these issues were raised, and you have been active during this period. If you want to make improvements to it, you should do so quickly. Vanamonde (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi Vanamonde. I've already added more inline citations to the article as requested. I was just waiting for more comments here, and/or the aforementioned (apparently now archived for lack of contributions) discussion over in WT:DYK to progress, before coming back to this. Have to head away now unfortunately (your notification just caught me) so I'll make a more detailed response to the remaining outstanding issue, of whether or not the two queried sources are Reliable Sources, tomorrow. Thanks! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Hello again. Now, as I already mentioned before, TankNutDave has a close relationship with the Bovington Tank Museum, to the point where the company routinely holds PR and educational outreach events at the museum (see linked youtube video for a quick example from a couple of years ago). In addition, it has a direct association with the Sveriges Försvarsfordonsmuseum Arsenalen located in Strängnäs, Sweden. TND, as it's also known, also routinely acts as an armoured vehicle consultancy, historical & otherwise, to organisations ranging from the BBC to Obsidian Entertainment (TND is actually part of the development team for Armored Warfare) to BAE Land Systems of all things. Not to mention that at least four of the senior staff can actually be considered to be qualified AFV instructors in their own right. TND also works with another company you may have heard of (especially if you are or have been a Top Gear fan) Tanks A Lot. With all of the above and the fact that it is a blog (somewhat ironically started as a modeling blog sideline of the company back in 2007) of a reputable & fairly widely known company rather than a personal blog it's not surprising that TankNutDave has already been used as a RS on a number of Tank/AFV articles throughout Wikipedia for at least a couple of years now. In a similar vein, the Secret Projects Forum since it's foundation back in 2006 or thereabouts, has gained a reputation both online and off as a very good resource for reasonably reliable (and even more importantly clearly sourced) information on various maritime, aviation, space, and defence subjects, with various well known historians and writers such as Chris Gibson and Bill Sweetman routinely contributing often well sourced historical data (including contemporary photographs, artist drawings, official documentation, etc.) alongside anonymous but knowledgeable posters from around the world. Any informed speculation or unclearly sourced information is normally clearly defined, or otherwise quickly flagged as such. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 23:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 7[edit]

R v Jordan (2016)

Created by Valmi (talk). Self-nominated at 18:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough. Long enough. According to QPQ Check, this is their first DYK, so no QPQ needed. I'm no lawyer, but "ruled" might work better than "judged" in the hook. Several paragraphs need citations. The hook fact is not cited. The lead mentions "a fixed maximum delay of 18 months from charges to trial, applicable to most cases", so it is not clear that the hook can be correct if there can be exceptions. Edwardx (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  • I've added references to all paragraphs--not new references though, just placing the existing ones in all places where I've used them. Is this a correct way to do things? I've taken the opportunity to extend the introduction. I think you are right that "ruled" is better. I could propose the following updated hook:
ALT1 ... that the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a person charged with an offence in a provincial court normally has to be tried within 18 months?
Valmi 03:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg ALT1, at 141 characters, is stated in the article, and referenced at the end of the sentence where it is mentioned. Striking original hook. As noted above, all paragraphs now have at least one in-line citations. Earwig's tool shows a high rate, only because it sees the block quote as a copy; so, no issues with copyvio. This one is good to go with ALT1.— Maile (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg No, they normally have to be tried within 18 months or within 30 months, depending on whether a preliminary enquiry is done or not. Nothing in the article or source indicates that 18 months is the normal situation and 30 months the abnormal one. Fram (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Returning to Nominations page for the consideration of a new hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

ALT2 ... that the Supreme Court of Canada held that a 44 month delay from filing charges to trial's end was unreasonable under §11 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? 176 characters.
ALT3 ... that the Supreme Court of Canada held as unreasonable a 44 month delay from filing charges to trial's end? 107 characters. 7&6=thirteen () 19:03, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to check newly proposed ALT hooks. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 8[edit]

How I Met Your Music

Created by HeyJude70 (talk) and 7&6=thirteen (talk). Self-nominated at 16:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Timely nominated. This article is a new track list, with virtually no content. Length in total bytes may comply with minimal requirements, but it is woefully devoid of content. If you excise the track list, we're talking 348 characters of countable text. No WP:QPQ alleged. I reformatted hook to put the track list in bold. I assume that is what the nominator is proposing. OTOH, hooks are is reliably sourced, neutral, and interesting. 7&6=thirteen () 16:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  • User talk:7&6=thirteen Added QPQ, however I completely ignored the lack of content in my own article. That's my mistake, my apologies. (Sorry for not pinging you, the template would not recognise your username)
QPQ confirmed. (Not yet promoted; not a requirement.) If you type {{User:7&6=thirteen}} it works. I added a little text, a block quote, and two sources. 926 characters, including the block quote (not sure if that even counts) (excluding the track list). Still thin gruel. 7&6=thirteen () 23:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
As to the track list contents, it is verbatim lift from the ITunes website (absent the price of each download). I assume that is alright, as there is nothing that can be done about the song titles and artists names. But is deserves mention as a possible copyvio, even though it is typical of record track listing articles. 7&6=thirteen () 00:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
As to both hooks ALT1, the sources show it was originally released only through ITunes. But an online search shows it is now available from Amazon.com so the ALT1 both hooks is are misleading. I sua sponte added the word "originally" to ALT1 both hooks. 7&6=thirteen () 00:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
I added two paragraphs and a reference lifted (and credited) from How I met your mother. One of them needs a citation. Added another reference. This is still pretty short on content. Added content suggestions (including expanding article to directly cover the "Deluxe" version) on the article talk page. This might necessitate a rename of the article. 7&6=thirteen () 01:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed. Could not get the article creator to respond. However, I think I've taken care of the content issue. I've substantially expanded the article beyond the track list (2307 1538 characters, including the blockquote). 13,700+ 8,925< bytes total. As I wrote on the article's talk page, it also might be possible to add some other content. There is also an issue regarding the article's name (which is only sort of a DYK issue). I would now like to be listed as a co-creator of the article, and am withdrawing as a reviewer. Can't be helped. 7&6=thirteen () 12:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Not reviewing, but I wanted to note this article still needs a lot of work. I've corrected some of the grammar and formatting but there are still problems in that regard. Most of the section "The series" has nothing to do with the album, and several critical opinions are presented as facts. This album appears to contain only original music from the show but the article is bloated with information (which reads like pieces of trivia) about the show's general use of music. 97198 (talk) 09:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
  • I have just updated this page to reflect the article move. 7&6=thirteen, are you planning to address the issues raised by 97198? It's been over four weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
  • BlueMoonset The rename of the article (which is new and 14,610 15,199 bytes currently, far in excess of the DYK threshold) should answer all the concerns. I expanded the article and the lead.
The two albums are inextricably intertwined with the show's soundtrack.
I have diligently tried to find on line reviews of the album. No luck. Maybe somebody with HighBeam access can find them? Or access to Newspapers.com?
There is a lot of content. We could even add the playlist for the second album. But other than that, I am out of sources.
I think we are well in excess of the standard for DYK. A review is needed. If that isn't good enough then fail it. 7&6=thirteen () 11:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to do a full review of the article. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment If you count the lead paragraph and the album section, we are well over 1700 characters. ("Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables etc.) The number of characters may be measured using this script (most accurate) or this one or this tool.) And that does not count the infobox, playlist, reference, or all of the text about the series. There is enough there that it would qualify for DYK (1500 characters) just based on those portions alone. 7&6=thirteen () 19:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
So just to clarify, since you didn't answer BlueMoonset's question above, you are not planning to fix the issues I mentioned above? 97198 (talk) 04:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
97198 To clarify, I think I both addressed and fixed the issues above. Article has been renamed, reformatted, and expanded. Hope that assuages your concerns. 7&6=thirteen () 10:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
As far as I can tell each of the issues I raised still stand:
  1. "I've corrected some of the grammar and formatting but there are still problems in that regard."
  2. "Most of the section "The series" has nothing to do with the album, and several critical opinions are presented as facts."
  3. "This album appears to contain only original music from the show but the article is bloated with information (which reads like pieces of trivia) about the show's general use of music."
You seem to do a produce of good work here so I guess I'm just surprised that you think an article like this is ready to appear on the main page. 97198 (talk) 10:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
The show's use of music is covered by the article renaming. In any event, it is the context in which the album arises, and better informs the readers. I added as a topic sentence to one paragraph: "Critics have been effusive in their praise of the show's music." Moved the section you deem "trivia" to the end of the article; the violation of copyright is important. This is a case where relevance is in the eye of the beholder. We will have to agree to disagree. 7&6=thirteen () 10:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Edited out the "trivia" per your suggestion. 7&6=thirteen () 10:46, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
It's looking slightly better now, and I trimmed a bit more. I still don't see why, in an article which begins with the bolded title How I Met Your Music (Original Songs from the Hit Series "How I Met Your Mother"), all of the detail about other music used in the show is relevant. Or how statements such as "The albums mirror the show's iconic prescient and well-placed choice of music" or "there are a great many impressive musical moments" are NPOV. Anyway, I'll step aside at this point since we seem unable to see eye-to-eye. 97198 (talk) 11:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I appreciate your POV and have tried to address your criticism. Thanks for the copy editing. 7&6=thirteen () 11:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer still needed to do a full review of the article. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 12[edit]

Henry Wade (surgeon)

Sir Henry Wade
Sir Henry Wade

Created by Iainmacintyre (talk) and Axxter99 (talk). Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk) at 19:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg @Andrew Davidson, Iainmacintyre, and Axxter99: New and long enough, QPQ done, Earwig detects no copyvios (but all of the sources are offline). I'm concerned that 8 of the 13 references are papers by Wade himself, which runs afoul of point 5 of WP:SELFPUB; there need to be more third-party sources. The "Urological surgeon", "Marriage", and "Death" sections lack references. Also, is it reasonable to call him a "pioneer cancer researcher" when his theory about cancer was incorrect? I think it's a good job at writing an article about an interesting subject, but it needs a wider variety of sources. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Points well taken. I have added citations , mainly from BMJ Obituary available online. He is not remembered for his erroneous cancer theory so that has been deleted. Thanks Papamac (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

@Andrew Davidson, Iainmacintyre, and Axxter99: I'd still like to see at least one secondary source per paragraph. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 00:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
@Andrew Davidson, Iainmacintyre, and Axxter99: Pinging. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm quite busy with other commitments this week, alas. I might get to it next week. Andrew D. (talk) 22:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 14[edit]

Biswa Ranjan Nag

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 15:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on April 18[edit]

Anti-Terror Units

Anti-Terror Units (YAT) fighters.
Anti-Terror Units (YAT) fighters.
  • ... that the leader of the United States-trained Anti-Terror Units was suspected to have been assassinated by Turkish Intelligence operatives for conducting "terror operations"? Source: "Less than a day after the IED explosion, Turkey’s Anadolu News trumpeted the assassination, saying that Ali Boutan, also known Haji Kurkhan, was the 'leader of the YPG special forces.' 'Boutan was responsible for sending [PKK] fighters to Turkey to conduct terror operations,' the report further claimed." ([1]); "[YAT] members were able to receive direct US Army Special Forces training. Ranking unit members were sent to the US to go through intense training at Ft. Bragg and Ft. Campbell, in addition to regional training at a special compound outside of Amman, Jordan, and in Kurdistan, under the guidance of the Central Intelligence Agency. In late 2016, Boutan was targeted and killed by what is believed to have been Turkish Intelligence operatives as he was traveling through Syria as part of the YPG Special Forces command" ([2])

Created by Applodion (talk). Self-nominated at 21:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg (In the article) "YAT members were simply the most brave and devoted fighters", "but not true special or elite forces". "Brave", "devoted", "true"—these labels need attribution. I would rephrase the sentence as follows: "Initially, YAT members were chosen by the YPG and YPJ as simply the most brave and devoted fighters within those units, but not as true special or elite forces." Aside from this non-neutral bit, the article meets length and newness requirements and is very interesting. Nice work. 23W 00:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Thank you for the review and the suggestion. I have changed the sentence accordingly; now it is much better. Applodion (talk) 10:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
23W Full review needed. If you are now satisfied this needs a tick. You didn't mention the image, the hook or the QPQ? 7&6=thirteen () 11:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 20[edit]

Josie Sadler

Josie Sadler in 1914 film "Josie's Declaration of Independence"
Josie Sadler in 1914 film "Josie's Declaration of Independence"
  • ... that Josie Sadler (pictured) left her career as a singer and actress to run her husband's electrical research business? Source: Walsh, Jim (June 1963). "Six Comediennes: Josie Sadler, Part II". Hobbies. Vol. 68 no. 4. Chicago: Lightner Publishing Corporation. pp. 33–34.
    • ALT1:... that Josie Sadler's (pictured) recording of her biggest Broadway hit was never released? Source: University of California Santa Barbara. "Victor matrix B-6695. If I could get some sleep / Josie Sadler". Discography of American Historical Recordings. Retrieved April 19, 2017

Created by 78.26 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC).

Symbol question.svg Interesting life, on good sources, no copyio obvious. - I'd prefer a hook about her main career, not the electrical research. - The image is licensed and gives a good idea about the period. - Article: "Sadler retired from show business in 1918 in order to run her husband's (at this point no longer Mr. Lennox, but a Mr. Geddes) electrical research business, subsequent to his death.", - I confess to find it too complicated, and would prefer a simple "after his death". How is this:
ALT2: ... that Josie Sadler (pictured) recorded her biggest Broadway hit but it was never released? - I am open to others, such as mentioning the German accent specialty. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
ALT3: ... that "Dutch" comic Josie Sadler (pictured) recorded her biggest Broadway hit for Victor, but it was never released?
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to complete review (no mention of size or age) including ALT hooks; previous reviewer hasn't returned in over four weeks, and proposed one of the hooks that needs consideration. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Previous reviewer is watching but can't approve own hook (and never mentions size and age when they are fine). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 22[edit]

Bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium(III) chloride

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Muscle Dysmorphia
  • Comment: Mcfliz is a new editor, having only edited draft and article space to create this new article plus commons edits for new diagrams associated with it. It was created by Mcfliz through the AfC process, moved to mainspace by Graeme Bartlett on 22 April, then there was a cut-and-paste moved by Smokefoot which Graeme repaired. This nomination is a little beyond the 7 day mark, but the work is an impressive new article (3720 characters of readable prose, 520 words, 7 images, 24 references) so I want to encourage McFliz with some main page attention. I need to do some work on the article (hopefully within 24 hours) to support ALT1 and ALT2, there are ample sources available. Now done. EdChem (talk) 08:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
  • References:

Moved to mainspace by Mcfliz (talk). Nominated by EdChem (talk) at 23:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC).

Symbol question.svg New and long enough, within policy, Earwig detects to copyvios, QPQ done. Scheme 13 of doi:10.3390/molecules17055893 uses a different synthetic route to anhydrovinblastine than doi:10.1021/ol025560c, which doesn't use the Nugent-RajanBabu reagent. Technically the hooks are still correct since it "can be" synthesized that way, but it would be better to show that the reagent is routinely used in that synthesis, especially commercially. Alternatively, is is possible to make a hook more accessible to laymen? How would you describe what reactions this reagent can do that can be done no other way? Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 21:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Mcfliz and EdChem: Pinging. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 09:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Ahmed bin Abdullah Balala

  • ... that Ahmed bin Abdullah Balala, a member of Legislative Assembly of the Indian state of Telangana, was arrested in a case of a mob allegedly attacking the state's deputy chief minister's house?Source:Source Text:MIM workers also attacked the house of deputy chief minister Mahmood Ali at Azampura and the Police was forced to disperse the MIM workers who allegedly tried to manhandle Mahmood Ali’s son Azam Ali. The deputy CM was present in the house when the incident occurred. Police arrested MIM MLA Ahmed Balala in connection with the attack and took him to the Bolarum police station, ..
  • ALT1:...that Ahmed bin Abdullah Balala, a member of Legislative Assembly of the Indian state of Telangana, won the 2014 elections by defeating a Bharatiya Janata Party candidate by 23 thousand votes?
    Source:Source Text:In Malakpet MIM sitting MLA Ahmed Bin Abullah Ballala won scoring 58,952 votes against Venkat Reddy of BJP who got 35,676 votes.

Created by Royroydeb (talk). Self-nominated at 17:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC).

  • This is not a full review, but that hook likely runs afoul of our BLP-related criteria: it focuses on a negative aspect of a living person. Vanamonde (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
@Vanamonde93: New hook added. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 05:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Vanamonde (talk) 06:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 23[edit]

Soul Rocker

Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 15:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg size and age ok, written neutrally. QPQ done. Regarding the KISS hook, offline source I guess I will take in good faith. I can't see it in the other hook. I guess from images they do look a bit like KISS...I think the KISS hook is more interesting than the other one, but will leave that ultimately to the promoter. However, I can't see in this source where it says that the two Tito Santanas are unrelated. Sorry, missed t he comment above. We will need a source saying they are not the same. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I like the KISS one as well, but just as a back up I'll find a source that states that the 31 year old Tito Santana is not the 63 year old Tito Santana, I am sure that is out there in a reliablebsource.  MPJ-DK  15:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Where in the U.S.A. Is Carmen Sandiego? (1986)

Created/expanded by Coin945 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Note: The Earwig's Copyvio Detector erroneously picked up a rating of 52.2%. The listed sites have basically copy-pasted the Wikipedia content, not the other way round, as well as the repeated text "Where in the U.S.A. Is Carmen Sandiego?".--Coin945 (talk) 13:08, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg The hook is well over 200 characters. Could you choose just one fact to highlight? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  • ALT1 has 173 characters. I hope this is satisfactory. Are there any other points you'd like to bring up? :D--Coin945 (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 25[edit]

Cognitive slippage

5x expanded by Comahgoodness (talk). Self-nominated at 14:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svgThank you for expanding this article! I hope you got double duty out of some of your writing :-). DYKcheck says the article was expanded 5x, so it's long enough and new enough. I didn't have time to check each source, but I spot-checked a few and they supported the statements they referenced. My main problem is that the reference for the hook doesn't contain the information in the hook. The article only defines cognitive slippage as "mild associative loosening." The hook should reflect the information in the source. A different hook would be fine too.
  • This isn't required for DYK, but in general the lead ought to summarize everything in the article. The information currently in the lead section explains what cognitive slippage is, and should be its own section. A page like panic attack has a separate section defining what it is. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 26[edit]

George H. Brimhall

5x expanded by Phelps (BYU) (talk). Self-nominated at 21:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. I think the original hook is more interesting to a general audience and suggest ALT2 as being better worded. The article is neutral and I detected no copivios. In the article it states that the "Y" is painted, but elsewhere it mentions that it is made of concrete. Could you clarify this? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, in 1908 students built a concrete retaining wall. I added this information with an additional source (an article from BYU magazine about the Y). From the historical photos on the BYU magazine article it looks like the Y is made of rocks on the mountain, which matches my memory of it.Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Thank you. New reviewer needed for ALT2. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 27[edit]

Helmut Franz

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 21:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article created on 27 April and DYK nominated on 4 May. So falls within 7 day range. QPQ is done. Hook length is within 200 characters. Hook reference mentioned here and in the article is a dead link. That needs to be replaced before it can be verified. Rest 3 sources support their claim. Also, 1880 B (309 words) "readable prose size" with German text of 312 characters, which, in my opinion, is not required as its an English Wikipedia. Without that as well, article length would be more than 1500 characters. - Vivvt (Talk) 03:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I am shocked to see that the link to five detailed pages of choir history are gone, and asked the publisher for help. For now, it's like an offline source, sorry. I am not sure what you mean about the German text. A translation never covers the original, so people reading German are better served by the original quote (unfortunately from the same history). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I found several new sources for support. The sound engineer remembers that Franz's recording was taken for the film, but as it is published in a "Forum" I used it as external link. Interesting reading! Lux aeterna seems to hae been written for the SWR Vokalensemble. I couldn't find exactly that the NDR sang the premiere, so dropped that claim. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Shasanka Mohan Roy

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 14:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC).

Gudjonsson suggestibility scale

5x expanded by CSD96 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Happy with hook. Article has met requirement for 5x expansion, is long enough, well sourced and free of copyright violations as per Earwig's. Article does not have an image and requires no QPQ as nominator has 0 DYK credits. However, the lede of the article should be expanded before nomination is passed. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Mutual exclusivity (psychology)

5x expanded by Thefreshtrumpet (talk). Self-nominated at 14:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Much of the article is unreferenced, including almost entire sections. There needs to be an inline citation after every paragraph at minimum. The hook is at the very least cited. All of the sources are referenced as if they are offline, but I managed to quickly find an online reference for the 12th reference. It seems highly likely that more of these sources are available online. SL93 (talk) 23:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Note that Thefreshtrumpet hasn't edited since making this nomination (which I believe was part of a university assignment). 97198 (talk) 11:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on April 30[edit]

George O. Abell

George O. Abell teaching at the Summer Science Program at the Thacher School in Ojai, California
George O. Abell teaching at the Summer Science Program at the Thacher School in Ojai, California

5x expanded by Shortsword (talk). Self-nominated at 10:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The article is new. Its length was improved from 2,641 chars on February 8, 2017 to 8,405 readable chars of prose on May 2i, 2017 making only a 3.18-fold expansion. Thus, it is less than the required 5x-expansion. Article needs to be expanded with additional text of at least 4,800 chars of readable prose. It is neutral and cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports matches with proper nouns only, no copyvio issues detected. Hook format corrected by me. It is interesting and its length is under limit. The hook facts are cited inline. Hook image is ©-free. QPQ was done. Failed to go. Needs above mentined expansion for approval. CeeGee 17:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @CeeGee: Well then, I guess that I should have saved myself the trouble of entering the nomination and saved you the trouble of reviewing it. I have no more material on George Abell with which to further expand the article. So, I guess that it is no go on this one. Thank you for your effort in the review. Shortsword (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Shortsword: Do not give up so early. DYK-check excludes following portions from the readable prose: (Career#Palomar sky survey): min. 591 chars, (Career#Teaching): min. 206 chars, (Career#Skeptism): min. 649 chars, (Astronical namesakes): min. 211 chars, (Affiliations): min. 783 chars. In total min. 2,440 chars. If it is possible to rewrite the structured text in prose, maybe you can save your DYK-nom. The artcile deserves to appear on the main page.Good luck. CeeGee 18:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg It has been a month, and no attempt has been made to edit the article further to make it eligible for DYK. Regretfully marking it for closure; note that should this ever become a Good Article, it would be eligible for DYK within seven days of being listed. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 1[edit]

Richard Painter

5x expanded by Edwardx (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg @Edwardx: Date and expansion fine. However I have a problem with the hook as I believe it is a BLP violation. Alleging that President Trump violating the constitution is not what one would consider suitable for the main page, not to mention it could be seen as POV pushing. Would need to be changed completely. Also a QPQ is needed. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 19:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
  • QPQ now done. Looking into other issues! Edwardx (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you The C of E for your review. I don't see it as a BLP violation as such, but one might argue against it on non-NPOV grounds, although I don't think there is a strong enough argument. For example, we had Template:Did you know nominations/Dissent Channel in February. We have a well-sourced article on CREW v. Trump, which I've now linked to from Painter's article. The most interesting thing for a hook is that Painter was W's chief ethics lawyer, and is now is now a prominent Trump sceptic. Edwardx (talk) 11:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 2[edit]

Warkworth's Chronicle

Created by Drmies (talk). Self-nominated at 03:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC).

For now, just bold subject, - do we really need all these apostrophes? - May review when I need a qpq. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
It's explained in the article. It's not by Warkworth, but "Warkworth" is the traditional name. Drmies (talk) 22:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I saw the explanation, - question is, though, do we need it in the hook? It made me stumble over the name, - you can actually drop the rest of the hook, because I clicked there, to find out. Now if you have no interest in readers (like me) getting the rest of the hook, keep it ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Next step. Detailed article, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. We need more refs, please, duplication to the facts in the hook, and duplication to all quotations in quotation marks. (I don't think "confused" needs quotation marks. My version of the hook would be:
ALT1: ... that the English Warkworth's Chronicle covers the years 1461 to 1474, reporting the double bleeding of Henry VI and a headless man who cries "Bowes, bowes, bowes"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 3[edit]

Blackchin shiner

  • ... that the Blackchin shiner was thought to have vanished from Ohio before 1940, until it was rediscovered there in the 1980s? Source - click on "Habitat & Behavior" section
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

5x expanded by Nrdyn8rlvr (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg File:Notropis heterodon.jpg is a non-free file which means that it is only allowed to be used in the article namespace per WP:NFCC#9; therefore, I have WP:HIDDEN so that it is not displayed in this template. I am not sure how this affects the over DYK nomination of the article, but Wikipedia's non-free use policy is quite clear that this kind of use is not acceptable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Ah my bad. hadn't realized. We can lose the image no problem. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. The previous image has been removed and a new non-free image has subsequently been uploaded and used in the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Melanerpes, Yellow-fronted woodpecker, White-fronted woodpecker, Golden-naped woodpecker, Yellow-tufted woodpecker

Yellow-fronted woodpecker
Yellow-fronted woodpecker

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg I'm new to reviewing these, but this hook seems really wordy and abstract, and sorta pedantic. I guess that sounds harsh, but it's simply a long list of species from a genus, followed by a common trait of that genus. Are we even allowed to make a whole list of bolded articles like that? Shouldn't only the main wikilink be bold? How about something like "...that the common trait of all melanerpes woodpeckers is black, white, and yellow plumage?" Just listing a bunch of species in the genus feels like boring filler. — Kaz (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
@Kazvorpal: Thank you for reviewing the article. The reason that all those species are mentioned is because I expanded five articles so it is a five article hook. That means five times as much for you to review, so move on to some other nomination if you wish! If you stick with it, you should look at each article in turn and see if they meet the DYK criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I don't need to look at each article, because my objection centers around "Content: interesting to a broad audience". A laundry list of species names is not going to interest many people at all. I suggest something more like "...that the common trait of all melanerpes woodpeckers is black, white, and yellow plumage?" — Kaz (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Sure, that might be a more interesting hook, but it hasn't got the necessary link to each of the five articles. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • But isn't the whole point for it to be interesting? It's not purely to promote a whole laundry list of articles generically. Or is that a part of the policy that I'm simply unaware of? — Kaz (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • As far as possible, hooks should be interesting to a general audience, but when you have multiple article hooks like this, the "interestingness" criterion may have to be forgotten. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Where is that, in the guidelines? As far as I know, it's the opposite of how DYK is prioritized. I've seen plenty of DYK with multiple hooks, but each hook has a separate function that is interesting, and usually one hook is primary. — Kaz (talk) 02:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 4[edit]

Walter Sydney Lazarus-Barlow

  • Reviewed: To be done

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 23:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, well referenced, and free from copvio from the sources I can access. All of the hooks are supported by inline citations; personally I think the original hook is the most interesting (I added "postmortem" lest one get the impression that he contracted a serious infection while writing an exam). Ping me when you've done a QPQ review and this will be good to go. 97198 (talk) 12:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Narada sting operation

Created by Forceradical (talk). Self-nominated at 07:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Comment: Per the article history, this page seems rather unstable. Yoninah (talk) 09:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Yoninah It would be appreciated if you could be a bit more specific.I see no edit wars going on a ,slight problem regarding the merging the article was resolved in the Talk page and is currently stale by more than 7 days.The removal of names of politicians is a part of my laPSE .I forgot to remove it after the AFC review.FORCE RADICAL⭐ @ 10:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
OK. I'll look into this more and do a review later today. Yoninah (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg This page was created on May 4 and nominated on May 27 by a new DYK nominator. I will IAR and accept it despite the 3-week time lag. Long enough, neutrally written, well referenced. No QPQ needed for first-time nominator. However, there are several outstanding issues which must be addressed before this can proceed to the main page:
  • Writing style: The article is written in newspaper fashion, with short, one-line/one-paragraph updates of each stage of the fallout and investigation. IMO it needs to be fleshed out and rewritten as an encyclopedic piece, with a proper lead summarizing the subject. (This means adding more to the lead about the aftermath/fallout/investigations.) Even if the investigations are ongoing, this should not look like a work in progress. You should add some explanation of why the sting was conducted by the newspaper. There are also too many subsections and sub-subsections here; please combine the information in longer paragraphs and fewer sub-sections.
  • Abbreviations: I spelled out some of the abbreviations for political parties, but there are other abbreviations (PIL, FIR) that I have no idea what they mean. In fact, the lines in which these abbreviations appear are lifted straight from the titles of the source articles, a violation of WP:COPYVIO:
  • Source: 3 PIL filed in Calcutta High Court, ED to begin probe
  • Article: three PILs from the Indian Congress party and BJP were filed in Calcutta High Court
  • Source: "CBI files FIR against 12 Trinamool leaders for 'criminal conspiracy'
  • Article: CBI filed a FIR against 12 Trinamool leaders for "criminal conspiracy".
  • Source: "State took action against SMH Meerza"
  • Article: the state initiated disciplinary proceedings against SMH Meerza
  • Citations: I added numerous tags to the article asking for clarification of who or what is being talked about.
  • Hook: The suggested hook is factual, not hooky. Perhaps there is an unusual or surprising aspect in the article that you can fashion a hook around?
  • Yoninah (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Forceradical: thank you for the expansion. However, the additions need a copyedit for English grammar and spelling. Also, the first part of this sentence doesn't make sense: A adhaar card in the name of Santhosh Shankaran was issued, a receptionist was hired to take phone calls from a phone number listed in a specially created webpage.
  • Did a newspaper really run a sting operation in order to boost its sales? That would make a better hook than the ones above. Yoninah (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 5[edit]

Dimitri Navachine

Created by TheGracefulSlick (talk). Self-nominated at 16:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Not a review, but without context or any date indication, the first hook is just... meh! Johnbod (talk) 03:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 7[edit]

The Darkest Minds (film)

  • Reviewed: Soon.

Created by Captain Assassin! (talk). Self-nominated at 17:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg This article is new enough (though it is listed on the wrong part of this page) but it is much too short. It needs to have at least 1500 bytes of prose, and it cannot be a stub. Perhaps it could be renominated if new information allows a five-fold expansion? Josh Milburn (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
  • It will be above 1500 bytes within 24 hours. So the review should be n hold until that. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 02:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

QPQ: ????
Overall:  —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 04:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

  • The article was expanded on 8 May 2017‎, and is at 2137 B as of this post. North America1000 22:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Emma Nāwahī

Created by KAVEBEAR (talk). Self-nominated at 23:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg - Length, Date, QPQ, and Earwigs check. However, from one of the sources, the newspaper is described as "accommodated to annexation" which is not clear considering the article and hook state that the paper was opposed to the overthrow of the former Kingdom which from my understanding was done to help facilitate annexation. Also, the image has no information about its date of publication or author. Being that this individual lived past 1923 (died in 1935) it is entirely possible that the image was published after 1923 and that the photographer lived beyond 1947 which means that the image might still be covered by copyright. Mifter Public (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Remove image from hook. I believe the photograph dates to the early 1900s or the 19th century given the age of Nāwahī in the photograph compared to her photograph in the 1890s group photograph and it is in the same style as the one made of her husband also from the Hawaii State Archives who died in 1896. I will look into it a bit more.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Mifter Public: Add some sources and tweaked the sentence a bit. The date was also wrong in retrospect. I believe the "accommodated to annexation" refers to the newspaper's stance post 1898, but it was founded to promote Hawaiian independence and protest annexations since that was the overarching political stance of the Republic of Hawaii government. Also it is written that way because of the way the opposition article is titled. I suggest ALT1.

Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New review needed.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 9[edit]

Sumitra Bhave–Sunil Sukthankar, Doghi, Vastupurush, Devrai, Samhita (film), Astu, Kaasav, National Film Award for Best Feature Film, National Film Award for Best Screenplay, National Film Award for Best Film on Other Social Issues, National Film Award for Best Film on Environment Conservation/Preservation

Created/expanded by Vivvt (talk) and Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Nominated by Vivvt (talk) at 12:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 10[edit]

Dianthus plumarius

Dianthus plumarius, garden pink
Dianthus plumarius, garden pink
  • Reviewed Melanerpes
  • Comment: I'm actually torn on whether to rename the article Garden pink, as per Wikipedia:Article titles advice on using the common, expected name over the formal one. Also, are we supposed to include an alt hook at the start? Or is alt1 really just for review suggestion based on reviews? Also, I see conflicting source formats, is there one that's the preferred way? Is the source following the hook just for the reviewer, or will it be used in the accepted hook, somehow? Should it be quoting the article to prove the hook is used in it, or should it be showing the citation used to footnote the fact in question?

Created by Kazvorpal (talk). Self-nominated at 02:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article created on 11 May and DYK nominated on 12 May. So fits within 7 day range. Both the hooks are within 200 character limit. QPQ done. 1582 B (253 words) "readable prose size" which is just above 1500 character limit. Reference 3 is a Bare URL so needs cleaning and it does not mention what article claims. Reference 4 is another encyclopedia so not sure if its allowed to cite. Reference 5 is a dead link. - Vivvt (Talk) 05:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
  • The fifth link works fine, I just checked it. As far as I know, the fourth link is considered acceptable, but I can change it if necessary. Link 3 is fixed. — Kaz (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Symbol possible vote.svg The referecnes used do not support the hook statement, they refer to the genus as a whole, and not this one species.--Kevmin § 19:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
  • No, if you read that entire reference, it includes this: "In the 16th Century, the Dianthus Plumarius was commonly referred to as a pink", that is the specific species in this article. It was in the 16th century, within 20 years of Dianthus Plumarius becoming documented as the flower called "pink", that the color becomes documented as being called pink. — Kaz (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Ajnad al-Kavkaz

Created by Applodion (talk). Self-nominated at 16:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 12[edit]

Maria Friesenhausen

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 06:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg New, long enough. This one will unfortunately need some serious work, Gerda Arendt. Bach-Cantatas is not a reliable source, as best I can tell. It is prepared by someone who is a self-proclaimed enthusiast of the topic, but I can find no mention that they're an authority on the subject. The portions of the text currently cited to Bach-Cantatas need alternative cites. Additionally, this needs a copy-edit. Some glaring issues that popped out at me: the first sentence of "Career" is convoluted with many clauses interrupting the flow of the sentence; many sentences begin with "In DATE" and no comma separating the dependent clause from the independent clause. Comma#Separation_of_clauses explains, although I just had to correct the same type of comma error I'm pointing out here in the article about commas. There appear to be some other comma errors as well, such as using a comma when none is needed to separate Siegmund Nimsgern and Gustav Leonhardt in a list. Commas are only needed in lists of three or more. Could you either copy-edit this yourself or ask someone else to do it? I'd normally do it but my prelim exams are in a week, so my time is short; I can handle it in two weeks if no-one's done it by then. Since the hook is currently cited to the unreliable source, I'll hold off on reviewing the hook until you change the sourcing. ~ Rob13Talk 03:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Please look at six featured articles with a source review to see that reviewers found several sources not reliable, but had no problems with Bach Cantatas (BWV 172, 22, 165, 4, 161, 125). Or, as Drmies once said: "a recoding is a recording", and they better represented at Bach Cantatas, with choir members and orchestra players listed, than at Amazon and WorldCat, who also don't have these early recordings by NDR, for example. - O dear, how many commas ;) - I will look at the commas in the article etc, but possibly not today, RL. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
@Nikkimaria: You provided the source review at Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten! BWV 172 (FA) ages ago, and didn't object to Bach-Cantatas. Could you take a look at that site and give your opinion on what qualifies it as reliable so I can better understand that? ~ Rob13Talk 06:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
@BU Rob13: The site has been cited by multiple scholars and works in the field, eg Claudia Jensen and John Potter. IMO while it is not a top-shelf source it is sufficient for uncontroversial information. That being said, that evaluation was in the context of a work rather than a BLP... Nikkimaria (talk) 11:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Of the biographical information, only the short section on her studies is taken from the site, for (at least so far) lack of other information. It is likely to be correct (if you ask me), and even if not it would not cause severe misinformation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
I even found a ref that supports the info and a bit more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
@Nikkimaria: Thank you for that information. Gerda Arendt As scholarly sources cite Bach-Cantatas, I'll accept the source for non-controversial biographical information, though not for any extraordinary claims. You can focus on the copyedit and then I'll do the full review again. ~ Rob13Talk 17:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
I tried, please check. The sentence with Nimsgern and Leonhardt could not be repaired by dropping the comma, because there's another "and" later, which would make it three, but would be wrong. I used a semicolon, although I don't like them. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Deepak Kumar (physicist)

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 18:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 13[edit]

Viola Sonata (Waterhouse)

  • Reviewed: Pillar of Gor
  • Comment: I thought about the word play of the sonata name and recording name, also about the catchy review title translating to "The viola in Jewish lament", but it came out too complicated.

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 12:31, 20 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 15[edit]

Muthusamy Lakshmanan

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 19:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC).

Witness (Katy Perry album)

  • ... that Katy Perry decided to "give [her] mental health a break" before working on her Witness album? Source: [6]
  • Reviewed: Cult of Chucky
  • Comment: Trying not to have a promotional-sounding hook

Created by SNUGGUMS (talk). Moved to mainspace by IndianBio (talk). Nominated by Feminist (talk) at 15:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC).

  • I personally don't think that's a particularly interesting hook compared to something like this: "Did you know that copies of Katy Perry's album Witness will be distributed with tickets for its accompanying tour?" (see [7]). Also, while I am the original article creator, IndianBio is the one who moved it to mainspace. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I've thought of using something like this, but such a hook may sound promotional to some editors (promotes the tour), and DYK in general is quite strict with such hooks. I'll leave this up to the reviewer to decide. Also, I think DYK credits the editor who did the most work, even though you technically didn't move this to mainspace. feminist 15:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I think the ALT1 suggested by Snuggums really works. The original hook is pretty basic as its the same kind of schtick all pop stars say. —IB [ Poke ] 16:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Typhoon Cary (1987)

Created by Yellow Evan (talk). Self-nominated at 05:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 17[edit]

Noor ur Rahman Barkati

Created by Royroydeb (talk). Self-nominated at 16:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Some wording (including this very hook) is way too close to the source. Compare "issued a fatwa against Prime Minister Narendra Modi" to "who issued a ‘fatwa’ against Prime Minister Narendra Modi" and "Barkati was accused of solemnising the marriage of a Muslim boy with a transgender girl" to "of solemnising the marriage of a boy with a transgender". Another issue is that the article has a quotation for "special prayers", but it would only be a true quotation if it said "special Osama prayers" because that is what the source exactly says. What does "citing that they were doing it from the British period" even mean? The biggest issue that I see here is that the entire article is negative things about the person. Are there not any positive things or alternative viewpoints? SL93 (talk) 03:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
@SL93: Thanks for the edits. I have made the other changes. I also would like to add "an Indian imam" to the hook:

ALT2 ... that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a fatwa from an Indian imam Noor ur Rahman Barkati for demonetising 500 and 1000 rupees bank notes? RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

N. V. Madhusudana

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 18:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC).

Alabang–Zapote Road

Alabang Zapote Road
Alabang Zapote Road

5x expanded by TagaSanPedroAko (talk). Self-nominated at 19:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 18[edit]

Typhoon Abby (1986)

Created by Yellow Evan (talk). Self-nominated at 23:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC).

My Family's Slave

  • ... that an article in The Atlantic tells a story about the family of a journalist who kept a slave for 56 years? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
  • Reviewed: pending

Created by Tataral (talk). Nominated by Shhhhwwww!! (talk) at 19:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC).

Macrolibramiento Palmillas-Apaseo el Grande

Created by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 02:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 19[edit]

Margit Neubauer

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 15:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC).

Bodog F. Beck

  • ... that physician Bodog F. Beck kept a beehive outside his window in New York for his "bee venom therapy"?
  • Reviewed: To be done

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 10:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC).

Jeong Duwon

  • ... that João Rodrigues's gifts to Jeong Duwon have been credited with introducing Korea to Western science and culture?
    • ALT1:... that, upon his introduction to Western science and culture, the Korean diplomat Jeong Duwon was most impressed by the military applications of the telescope?
    • ALT2:... that Jeong Duwon was able to introduce the telescope to Korea because Portuguese artillerists were training the Ming army in the port city of Dengzhou?
    • ALT3:... that the firearm(s) Jeong Duwon received as a gift from Rodrigues Tçuzu have been variously described as a cannon, a fieldgun, a musket, and a pair of pistols?
    • ALT4:... that, upon their introduction to Western geography, the Korean diplomats Jeong Duwon and Yi Yeonghu were most curious with whether or not China was actually the center of the world?
  • Reviewed: Will do "Lofty" Chiltern
  • Comment: @Reviewers: Don't worry. You only need to review the hook(s) most interesting to you.

Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 06:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC).

A Year of Lesser, The Time in Between, The Retreat (David Bergen novel)

Created/expanded by Vivvt (talk). Self-nominated at 09:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 20[edit]

Riwŏn

  • ... that the economy of Riwon is based on fishing, supplemented by the income of local members of the North Korean navy?
    • ALT1:... that local businesses and workers assisted the US landing at Riwon, North Korea, in 1950?
    • ALT2:... that the US and South Korean army landed at Riwon in late October 1950 and was pushing towards the Chinese border when the PRC's entrance into the Korean War forced them back?
    • ALT3:... that tanks were used as makeshift towtrucks during the US Army's landing at Riwon in late October 1950?
    • ALT4:... that North and South Koreans have different pronunciations for the town of Riwon?
  • Reviewed: Will do Eva Randová
  • Comment: @Reviewers: Don't worry. You only need to review the hook(s) most interesting to you.

Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 06:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC).

Poerbatjaraka

5x expanded by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC).

Pichu Pichu

Pichu-Pichu from Arequipa
Pichu-Pichu from Arequipa

5x expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 18:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg This fact is certainly interesting and probably would make a good DYK. However, there are a few wording issues with the article, although I fixed some of the ones in the mummy paragraph. The fact about 3 mummies is sourced, but source 16 does not mention Pichu Pichu as far as I could tell (there may be something I missed). The image needs to be cropped to 100x100 pixels. I also think the wording of the hook could be improved, and I suggest the following alternate:

Hotelito Desconocido

  • ... that ecotourism resort Hotelito Desconocido reportedly laundered money for a Mexican drug cartel? Source: (Spanish) En agosto, la PGR aseguró el Hotelito Desconocido, ubicado en Tomatlán, Jalisco, ya que presuntamente el CJNG lo ocupada para lavar dinero. (English): In August, the PGR seized Hotelito Desconocido, located in Tomatlán Jalisco, because the CJNG was reportedly using it to launder money. (Note): The "c" in CJNG stands for cartel, or drug cartel.

Moved to mainspace by ComputerJA (talk). Self-nominated at 08:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC).

Deepak Dhar

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 07:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 21[edit]

Full Fact

Full Fact editathon on the UK's EU Referendum in 2016
Full Fact editathon on the UK's EU Referendum in 2016

Created by Andrew Davidson (talk). Self-nominated at 19:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg @Andrew Davidson: Date and length fine. However the article still has stub tags on it and the hook claim is not clear in the body of the article. QPQ done, pic licence fine (though not sure about using it as a lead hook). Once those are sorted, then I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Dream Mine

The entrance of the Dream Mine
The entrance of the Dream Mine

Created by FallingGravity (talk). Self-nominated at 21:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

Church of Reinhardtsgrimma

Church of Reinhardtsgrimma
Church of Reinhardtsgrimma

Created/expanded by NearEMPTiness (talk) and Altkatholik62 (talk). Nominated by NearEMPTiness (talk) at 16:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Comment: I bolded the subject, twice. I think the name Silbermann should be mentioned, which might be more interesting than details about tuning, or some year. I would picture the organ, not the church. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Silbermann organ
Silbermann organ

Hughes Dynamics

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self-nominated at 10:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Velipadinte Pusthakam

Created by Jupitus Smart (talk). Self-nominated at 09:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 22[edit]

Oscar Lerman

  • ... that Oscar Lerman produced The Stud, The Bitch, and two children with Jackie Collins?
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
  • Reviewed: not yet done

Created by Edwardx (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC).

Pankaj Chandak

Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Nick Moyes (talk) at 01:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC).

Pavlovian-instrumental transfer

  • Comment: This is my first DYK nomination. ALT1 is slightly more precise, but less accessible to a general audience.

Created by Seppi333 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 23[edit]

Sun Yuanhua

Sun Yuanhua's 1632 diagrams illustrating simple star fort designs
Sun Yuanhua's 1632 diagrams illustrating simple star fort designs
  • ... that Ignatius Sun advocated for Ming China's adoption of red-barbarian cannon and fortifications to defend itself from the Manchu invasion that produced the Qing Dynasty?
    • ALT1:... that the Christian governor Ignatius Sun’s clemency towards two mutinous subordinates prompted the Ming to execute him?
    • ALT2:... that, of all Europe's military developments during the Renaissance, the Chinese military theorist Ignatius Sun was most impressed by the angled bastions of its star forts?
    • ALT3:... that Portuguese artillerists defended Dengzhou, China, to the death in 1632 but its Chinese governor Ignatius Sun not only surrendered but was freed by his captors for his earlier kindnesses?
    • ALT4:... that the Chinese military theorist Sun Yuanhua was a protégé of Matteo Ricci's convert and friend Paul Xu, who instructed him on the military applications of trigonometry?
    • ALT5:... that Ignatius Sun, the Christian governor of northern Shandong, played a part in the introduction of western science, technology, and culture into Joseon Korea?
    • ALT6:... that the Jiading estate of Chinese military theorist Sun Yuanhua was the site of an important meeting of Jesuit missionaries and converts dealing with the China rites controversy?
    • ALT7:... that Chinese scholar Ignatius Sun failed his imperial exam but nonetheless attracted support from the highest levels of government for his detailed and well-reasoned defense proposals?
    • ALT8:... that Sun Yuanhua’s niece married the grandson of his mentor Xu Guangqi?
  • Reviewed: Will do Lazy Afternoon
  • Comment: @Reviewers: Don't worry. You only need to review the hook(s) most interesting to you.

Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 04:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC).

Operation Temperer

  • ... that under Operation Temperer, thousands of British Army troops can be deployed to support police in guarding key sites in the UK against terrorist threats?

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 23:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg New enough. Long enough. Can't see where the specific hook fact is cited at the end of a a sentence in the article. The article is mostly about other troop deployments in the UK and other countries, and needs more specific content. Earwig returns " Violation Suspected 86.1%". For example, the source has "Operation Temperer is a plan to deploy troops to support police officers in key locations following a major terrorist attack. It was put into effect for the first time following the Manchester Arena bombing." and the article, "Operation Temperer is a British government plan to deploy troops to support police officers in key locations following a major terrorist attack. It was put into effect for the first time on 23 May 2017 following the Manchester Arena bombing." This represents a serious copyright violation, and it is not the only copyvio issue. Also, the QPQ review does not address all the required criteria. Edwardx (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  • The specific hook fact is cited in the very first reference in the article [11]. There is a copyvio issue, but not in the direction that you apparently think. The author of this external article has plagiarised large chunks of it from the Wikipedia article that I wrote. Look at the dates: the Wikipedia article was published and nominated on 23 May while the external article was published on 24 May. Chunks of it appear to also have been plagiarised from 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. You need to bear in mind that Earwig will only show you that content has been duplicated - it will not show you in which direction the duplication has taken place. Also, what is missing from the QPQ review? Prioryman (talk) 17:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Oops. Very sorry, Prioryman. Will look into this again and report back soon! Edwardx (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 24[edit]

La balsa

Original 7-inch release of "La balsa"
Original 7-inch release of "La balsa"

Created by Bleff (talk). Self-nominated at 00:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

George Baldanzi

Created by JoeyJets (talk) and TonyBallioni (talk). Nominated by TonyBallioni (talk) at 16:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC).

Fugitive peasants

  • ... that phenomena of fugitive peasants was common in serfdom societies? Source: most clear source I found for that is in Polish: [12]: "zbiegostwo... przez caly okres gospodarki folwarczanej... bylo zjawiskiem powszechnym"
    • ALT1:... that fugitive peasants were condemned by some landlords, and welcome by others? Source: [13] and others linked in the article

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 05:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC).

Source: Wagner, W.J. (1992). "May 3, 1791, and the Polish constitutional tradition". The Polish Review. 36 (4): 383–395. JSTOR 25778591. Kpalion(talk) 17:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Jennie Anderson Froiseth

  • ... that Jennie Anderson Froiseth, an anti-polygamy crusader during the 1800's, published a book about experiences women had in polygamous marriages?
  • Reviewed: This is my first DYK nomination.

Created by Bela Gandhi (talk). Nominated by Gandhi (BYU) (talk) at 15:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

  • I just wanted to suggest a few more hooks:
  • ALT2... that, wanting to make friends with other women, Jennie Anderson Froiseth organized a women's club for fellow non-Mormons in Utah in 1875?
  • ALT3... that anti-polygamist Jennie Anderson Froiseth fought against women's suffrage for Mormon women, arguing that they were too heavily influenced to make independent decisions? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 25[edit]

Neodiprion pinetum

  • ... that heavy infestations of white pine sawfly can defoliate a tree or even kill it?

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 18:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

Us Conductors

Rockmore (Left) and Termen (or Theremin, Right) at her birthday celebration
Rockmore (Left) and Termen (or Theremin, Right) at her birthday celebration

5x expanded by Vivvt (talk). Self-nominated at 06:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Sarah Lancashire

British actress Sarah Lancashire
British actress Sarah Lancashire

Created by Eshlare (talk). Self-nominated at 09:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article list is new and long enough. Prose is neutral, no copyvio detected, and is well-referenced (as are the tables). However, I would suggest using the {{en dash}} template for date ranges, and removing the sentence informing readers that it's a list of the subject's accolades and use the paragraph that follows as the introductory instead. (Why is "Actress" capitalized in Lancashire is an English Actress?) Image used was retrieved from Flickr and is properly licensed. The hook is referenced in the article, clocks at exactly 200 characters (sans the ellipsis and pictured), and is interesting. QPQ done. Just fix the minor concerns and this one's good to go. Bluesphere 08:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Modern Gothic cabinet (Metropolitan Museum of Art)

Modern Gothic exhibition cabinet
Modern Gothic exhibition cabinet

Created/expanded by BoringHistoryGuy (talk) and 7&6=thirteen (talk). Nominated by 7&6=thirteen () at 13:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC).

@Yoninah: Can you properly add this picture to the hook - the nominator would like it added. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk)
I formatted the image and also adjusted the page link and DYK credits, since the page has been moved to Modern Gothic cabinet. Yoninah (talk) 18:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

2017–18 RFU Championship

  • Reviewed: Typhoon Kelly (1987)
  • Comment: Maybe for one of the Lions tests (24 June, 1 July, 8 July)

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 09:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 26[edit]

Irish Fright

  • ... that the Irish Fright caused thousands of English people to arm themselves against non-existent Irish marauders falsely claimed to be burning and massacring English towns?
    • ALT1: ...that the Irish Fright caused thousands of English people to arm themselves against non-existent Irish marauders believed to be burning and massacring English towns?

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 22:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Article meets newness criterion; prose expanded more than fivefold within the last 7 days. Prose is long enough. Within policy: sufficient inline citations, seems neutral, etc. Hook does not exceed 200 characters. Interesting hook. Wording is slightly redundant; prefer ALT1 that I added. Ergo Sum 02:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hālaliʻi Lake, Halulu Lake

  • ... that despite being the smallest of the inhabited Hawaiian Islands, Niʻihau possess Hālaliʻi Lake and Halulu Lake, the largest lakes in the archipelago?
    • ALT1:... that Hālaliʻi Lake, the largest intermittent lake in Hawaii, was once used for sugarcane cultivation?
    • ALT2:... that mullets swim into Halulu Lake, the largest natural lake in Hawaii, through lava tubes and were formerly protected by a kapu?
  • Reviewed: Hoplocampa testudinea
  • Comment: I am also down to just promoting as separate hooks (ALT1 and ALT2). Feel free to suggest others. There are also some common text between articles, just notify me what your final count of qualify characters are for each and I will add the remaining extra needed if it is not sufficient

Created by KAVEBEAR (talk). Self-nominated at 05:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

Current nominations[edit]

Articles created/expanded on May 27[edit]

Monkenhurst

Monkenhurst
Monkenhurst
  • Reviewed: To be done
  • Comment: I am working on some better hooks

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 17:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The article is long enough (1,600+ characters), has numerous references. The current hook is cited. The image was uploaded by the nominator and is ok to use. QPQ has not been done yet. ––Երևանցի talk 09:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Muhammad III, Sultan of Granada

  • ... that at the beginning of his reign, Muhammad III allied Granada with Castile and Aragon against the Marinids, while at the end those three powers were allied against it? Source: "Muhammad III had begun his reign by entering into a tripartite alliance against the Marinids. He was now outmaneuvered, and the three alliance was against him." (Harvey p. 170)

5x expanded by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Yellow-crested woodpecker

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

Gauthier Destenay

Created by Jupitus Smart (talk). Self-nominated at 12:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC).

  • REVIEW STARTED. New enough. Long enough. QPQ done. Edwardx (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Empty Orchestra

  • Comment: I have gone with Deaf rather than deaf as this is how Howlett self-identifies in the blogpost. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Moved to mainspace by J Milburn (talk). Self-nominated at 22:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg size and age pass, written neutrally, hook cited and faithful to source (blogs can be iffy as sources but nature of content and writer of source indicate within guidelines), Earwig's copyvio checker partly inflated by quotes, which is okay. @J Milburn: I don't see a QPQ though....otherwise good to go. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Henry W. Sawyer

Created by Coemgenus (talk). Self-nominated at 21:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

Porco (caldera)

Silver mined at Porco
Silver mined at Porco

Created by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 12:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

Albert H. Densmore

Created by Orygun (talk). Self-nominated at 02:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 28[edit]

Stella Rush

Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Samborombón Bay

5x expanded by Bryanrutherford0 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC).

Mkrtich Khrimian

A 1900 portrait of Khrimian
A 1900 portrait of Khrimian

Improved to Good Article status by Yerevantsi (talk). Self-nominated at 09:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 29[edit]

Gonçalo Teixeira Corrêa

The route of Capt. Correa's expedition
The route of Capt. Correa's expedition
  • ... that the Portuguese captain Gonçalo Teixeira Correa died defending Ming China from its own army?
    • ALT1:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa died defending Penglai, China, in 1632?
    • ALT2:... that the Portuguese artillerist Gonçalo Teixeira Correa posthumously became an assistant regional commander of the Ming Empire?
    • ALT3:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa scared the Manchu away from Beijing only to be reassigned once an epidemic outbreak ensured they wouldn't return for years?
    • ALT4:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa marched ten modern cannon across China in the 1620s and fired them from Beijing's city walls?
    • ALT5:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa marched his artillery company across China from Macao to defend the Ming from their Manchu invaders?
    • ALT6:... that Guangzhou's merchants refunded the Ming emperor for the expense of Capt. Correa’s reinforcements, rather than risk closer ties between Beijing and Macao?
    • ALT7:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa’s artillery company and its reinforcements both smuggled Jesuits into the Ming Empire?
    • ALT8:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa crossed China in the 1620s to train the Ming army in modern artillery but lost his life to a mutineer's arrow?
    • ALT9:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa marched ten modern cannon across the Ming Empire in the 1620s, only to lose them to a mutineer who ultimately joined the Manchu invasion that established the Qing Dynasty?
    • ALT10:... that Gonçalo Teixeira Correa and his company of Portuguese artillerists routed a Manchu raiding party from the walls of Zhuozhou in 1630?
    • ALT11:... that Ming officials were divided as to whether the Manchu invasion or Western 'helpers' like Gonçalo Teixeira Correa were actually the greater threat to China?
  • Reviewed: Red-billed Quelea
  • Comment: @Reviewers: Don't worry. You only need to review the hook(s) that are interesting to you.

Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 13:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Truth Serum (EP)

Improved to Good Article status by Paparazzzi (talk). Self-nominated at 05:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on May 30[edit]

Cephalotes caribicus

Cephalotes caribicus worker in amber
Cephalotes caribicus worker in amber
  • ... that workers of the fossil ant Cephalotes caribicus (pictured) reached adult lengths of only 4.64 mm (0.183 in)?

Source: "Measurements (in mm) and indices: TL 3 .97-4.64" (de Andrade 1999 pg. 420)

    • ALT1:... that Cephalotes caribicus worker ants (pictured) have semitransparent expansions on their bodies possibly for protection?

Source: "vertexal angles and membranaceous expansions semitransparent" & "Expansions of different body parts serve to protect the appendages and should function primarily against other ants and arthropods in general" (de Andrade 1999 pages 420 & 848)

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 00:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

Dorothy Hazard

Mistress Dorothy Hazard and the Women of Bristol Defending the Frome Gate against Prince Rupert, 1643 by Gerald Moira
Mistress Dorothy Hazard and the Women of Bristol Defending the Frome Gate against Prince Rupert, 1643 by Gerald Moira
  • ... that Dorothy Hazard effectively founded a Bristol church that survived for over 300 years?
    Source: "...Mrs Dorothy Hazard, the effective founder of a Baptist church which, more than 300 years later, still flourishes" Collinson, 2003
    • ALT1:... that Dorothy Hazard, a preacher's wife, led a group of women in the defence of Bristol during the English Civil War (pictured)?
      Source: "At one point, a group of women in the town, led by Dorothy Hazard and Joan Batten, held up the Royalist attack on the Frame [sic] Gate when the soldiers lost heart" Bennett, 2016

Created by Yunshui (talk). Self-nominated at 11:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC).

will review this, hopefully tomorrow --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

1967 Penang Hartal riot

5x expanded by Earth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg I do not think the expansion of this article is large enough. I can't be sure as DYKcheck is not working properly for me for some unknown reason, but I do have a concern here. The hook is cited, backed up in the source, but a little dry if you don't know why Malaya and Malaysia are different. While you're at it, filling out some of the reference information (I had no idea the hook source was the Straits Times) and adding an inline citation to the last standalone sentences of the Cause and Aftermath sections would be very good idea. No QPQ needed — you have four DYK credits total with the last one coming in January 2009, so it's great to see you come back! Raymie (tc) 06:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 31[edit]

The Blair Witch Project

  • ... that to render events of The Blair Witch Project as real, its actors were listed on the IMDb as "missing, presumed dead"? ref. 29

Improved to Good Article status by Bluesphere (talk). Self-nominated at 09:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

Ka Island

  • ... that the Chinese general Mao Wenlong favored free trade and heavy taxes at his garrison on Ka Island, North Korea?
    • ALT1:... that Mao Wenlong's protection of smugglers and raiders on Pi Island (now within North Korea) led to his controlling most trade on the Yellow Sea?
    • ALT2:... that Ajige beheaded Shen Shikui for his refusal to surrender Pi Island?
    • ALT3:... that Pi Island is not one of the Pi Islands?
    • ALT4:... that the Manchu were only able to remove the Ming from Ka Island, North Korea, by carrying out an amphibious landing at night?
    • ALT5:... that Mao Wenlong took advantage of the chaos of the Manchu invasions of China to turn his base on Ka Island, North Korea, into a free port and personal kingdom?
    • ALT6:... that the Chinese general Mao Wenlong tried to extort copper and iron from Joseon Korea to mint his own currency on Pi Island?
  • Reviewed: Sovereignty Restoration Day
  • Comment: @Reviewers: Don't worry. You only need to review the hook(s) that are interesting to you.

Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 04:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

May Bonfils Stanton

Petit Trianon, Versailles
Petit Trianon, Versailles

Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 00:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

Tweneboa Enyenra Ntomme Oil Field

  • ... that the TEN Oil Field in Ghana is not so named because it started with ten oil wells?

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self-nominated at 16:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

Ernest Addison

Created by Crosstemplejay (talk). Self-nominated at 11:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

ArsenalFanTV

Moved to mainspace by 92.233.254.32 (talk), Qwe829 (talk), and The C of E (talk). Nominated by The C of E (talk) at 09:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

Château d'Ainay-le-Vieil

  • ... that Château d'Ainay-le-Vieil was the only castle in Poitiers to remain in French hands after 1356 during the Hundred Years' War? Source: Château d'Ainay-le-Vieil website

5x expanded by Vami IV (talk). Self-nominated at 09:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

Vintage Grill & Car Museum

1975 Trabant in the Vintage Grill & Car Museum
1975 Trabant in the Vintage Grill & Car Museum

Moved to mainspace by Michael Barera (talk). Self-nominated at 08:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC).

  1. ^ "About". Vintage Grill & Car Museum. Retrieved May 15, 2017. 
  2. ^ Blok, Celestina (October 2016). "Wheels and Meals: Vintage Grill & Car Museum in Weatherford". Texas Highways. Retrieved May 15, 2017. 

Articles created/expanded on June 1[edit]

Roy Wiggins

  • ... that Roy Wiggins claimed to have ruined 80 million records? Source: Streissguth (2009) p.148

Created by 78.26 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Austin Church, John Dwight (manufacturer)

Arm & Hammer Soda
Arm & Hammer Soda
Ref is Williams of book Vintage marketing that reads on page 66, Dr. Church joined with his brother-in-law, John Dwight, and in 1847 the pair began manufacturing baking soda in Dwight’s Massachusetts kitchen. John Dwight & Co. became the first company to make and sell baking soda in the United States. Prior to this, baking soda was still being imported from England.
Ref is Rice, Randall Peter of book Beyond The Bottom Line that reads on the bottom of page 55, Church & Dwight was founded in 1846 by Dr. Austin Church and his brother-in-law, John Dwight. The company began as a seller of baking soda through New York grocers. The Arm & Hammer trademark came from another Church family business, Vulcan Spice Mills.
Ref is inline newspaper clipping of 6 January 1947 of Alton Evening Telegraph-page 4, titled What is the origin of the Arm & Hammer trademark? - that reads, Q. What is the origin of the arm and hammer trade-mark used on boxes of baking soda. A.The firm of Church and Sons was established by Dr. Austin Church and two sons to produce soda in about 1846. One of the sons had owned the Vulcan Spice Mills which had the arm and hammer trade-mark. This was adopted by the new firm.
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self-nominated at 20:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Rustin McIntosh

Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Angelo De Donatis

Created by Ergo Sum (talk). Self-nominated at 02:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

British hydrogen bomb programme

The Grapple 2 test, as reported by Universal International Newsreel. Orange Herald is incorrectly described as a hydrogen bomb.

Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Hydrus (roller coaster), Star Jet

Star Jet wreckage in the Atlantic Ocean after Hurricane Sandy
Star Jet wreckage in the Atlantic Ocean after Hurricane Sandy
  • ... that after being thrown into the Atlantic by Hurricane Sandy, the roller coaster Star Jet (wreckage pictured) was replaced by Hydrus—this time, safely inland...? Source: "Nearly five years after Superstorm Sandy ravaged Casino Pier and dumped its old coaster into the ocean"..."Park owners decided it would be safer to rebuild above the beach." NPR

Created by IronGargoyle (talk). Self-nominated at 20:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

Peter Bonsall-Boone

Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

Beer can chicken

Beer can chicken
Beer can chicken
  • ... that some people are avid proponents of beer can chicken (pictured), while others contend that the dish is overrated and not backed by science?

5x expanded by Northamerica1000 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

Neasa Hardiman

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Eshlare (talk). Self-nominated at 11:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

Brut Chronicle

  • ... Did you know that in medieval England, the Brut Chronicle was one of the most-copied chronicles of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries?[22]

Janina Goss

  • ... that Janina Goss is considered "power behind the throne" in modern Polish politics? the most important women

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 08:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on June 2[edit]

A Voz do Brasil

  • ... that A Voz do Brasil is the oldest radio program in the Southern Hemisphere? Source: "Com 81 anos, A Voz do Brasil é o programa de rádio mais antigo do país e do Hemisfério Sul ainda em execução."
    • ALT1:... that a São Paulo radio station was forced to close for a day for not carrying the mandatory program A Voz do Brasil? Source: "A Rádio Metropolitana Paulista terá sua transmissão suspensa por um dia por não retransmitir, reiteradas vezes, o programa A Voz do Brasil das 19 às 20h"

Created by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 07:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

Puchuldiza

Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 19:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Articles created/expanded on June 3[edit]

Washington State Route 522

Sound Transit Express route 522
Sound Transit Express route 522

5x expanded by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 09:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

Special occasion holding area[edit]

The holding area has moved to its new location at the bottom of the Approved page. Please only place approved templates there; do not place them below.

Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section above, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began; indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated (i) within seven days of creation or expansion (as usual) and (ii) between five days and six weeks before the occasion, to give reviewers time to check the nomination. April Fools' Day is an exception to these requirements; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.